THE CELEBRATION
Congratulations on buying the Celebration
This is our very own remake of a system by Dr Jack, originating from Pro Math’s Converging Factors, a ground breaking article from 1955 which was made into a book and is included in your purchase. Also included is our unique trainer and jockey ratings system to help you pick the right winner. The trainer and jockey rating system is NOT and indication of most likely winner. It is an attempt to tell you which combination is most likely to give you a good run for your money! We have tinkered around with the trainer jockey ratings spreadsheet a lot and there are a few systems that have made money over the long term, but for this system we are inviting you to use it to help in the selection process.
Dr Jack was a well-known gambler a long time ago who was renowned for his sharp dress sense, positive attitude and always wearing a carnation and picking lots of winners and exiting the bookmakers with a lot more money than he went in with. His catchphrase was “Every day is a celebration”, usually when he was picking up money from the cash out counter. His system was born out of Converging Factors by Pro Math (a columnist who was often ridiculed by his strategies but was consistently in profit over the long term).
Dr Jack, who wasn’t really a doctor, devised his own system after monitoring horse racing tipsters winning and losing streaks. He saw a strategy that actually still works today. Remember, this is way back, well over 50 years ago. We have monitored this system and it still works but we have ironed out the creases and adapted a smarter and more successful system. [update – customers have been telling us how much money they’ve been making just using this system alone! We are not surprised]
But let’s look at what defines success. In our opinion there are several factors. Firstly, the obvious one- profit. Without profit, no system can be called a success. But there are more success criteria for us. Control is one. We have helped people turn from hopeless punters to profit machines. These people had a good knowledge of what they were gambling on but were lacking in other areas.
Control is much needed in successful gambling. Without it, forget it. If you are overly compulsive in any way then gambling might not be the best thing for you to do. The best gamblers are the ones in control or as much in control as they possibly can be. You have no control over the horse, jockey, trainer in a race. You are completely powerless. You do have control over how much you stake, bankroll management, stress management, whether you bet, how you bet, what strategy you use. Most losing punters range from people who just want a flutter, a bit of fun, to those serious about gambling with aspirations of making a living from punting but not having much success despite spending hours and hours studying form.
We recommend having a bankroll that you can afford to lose. If you can comfortably write of £1000 then it’s that. If it’s just £100, go with that. But you are in control of your bankroll. For staking, on outright gambling we recommend 1%, but it really depends on the individual. 1% is a good place for most people. If you have £1000, then £10 win or lose is not exactly going to emotionally affect you is it? However, there are variants to this system that have a very high strike rate, so you might want to up the stakes, but when it turns into trading you must have an exit strategy. Trading is about having a good reason to enter and a good reason to exit. Having rules in place is an absolute must for trading. Being free and easy can get you in a whole heap of trouble.
Another thing you have control over is whether you bet or not. This is absolutely key! Selection process. One of our favourite pro gamblers has a golden rule of 7/2 or over. If he’s studied the form for days or weeks and the horse they think will win is 100/30, he won’t touch it. This is control. This is success. If the horse wins, so what? He’s won by sticking to the rules. He figures that he needs a strike rate of 33% to get profit. Let’s say he stakes £100 and only gets 2 winners out of 10. 20% strike rate is pretty achievable right? That means he will lose £100. Total stake £1000, total return £900 – £100 Loss. If he gets 3 winners out of 10? £350 profit! Not bad. 4 winners and it’s £800! But remember this is a minimum odds system. The chances are most horse are going to be above 7/2. Let’s say he has 3 winners, one is at 7/2 and two at 4/1. That’s a £450 profit right there! If he gets, and he does a lot, a double-digit winner that’s a minimum of £1000 profit if he gets a 33% strike rate. Anyway, this is just to show you his control. He sets the rules. He’s in control.
There are so many absolute garbage horse racing systems out there. Mostly using the Martingale staking system. Arguably the worst one is the favourite backing using the martingale system. According to our data, over the last 14,000 UK and Ireland races, there have been over 100 times where there’s been 6 losers in a row. But also, on two occasions there has been a 21 losing favourite streak! 21 times on a Martingale staking system! Can you imagine how much you would be risking? It’s insane and a terrible system to use. Here’s the deal. Let’s say after the 5th losing favourite race, you bet on the favourite and there’s a delay in the race. All of a sudden your “favourite” drifts and another horse becomes favourite. What then? This is a case of the market controlling your bet. Something that we definitely don’t want.
We’ve coached clients who lost it all on Martingale systems. They were making steady money and had a bot to do the work for them so they wouldn’t “stress” about it. But in the end, the whole bankroll went in one bad day! Not good at all.
Another way of controlling is figuring out a plan of action for the day. Either we select the horses in that morning and stick to that or we focus on particular races at a certain time. For example if we are free from 2pm to 4pm, focussing on those races. What works for some, really well, is to have a stop loss on each day. Some set loss limits where the maximum you can lose in one day is 5% of your total bankroll. So, if you have 5 losers in a day, you stop regardless. In order to come up with rules, you will need to know yourself, warts and all. If you chase losses, you might want to have a stop rule in place. We know some pro gamblers who are pretty aggressive after a few losses. But bear in mind that these people have years of experience and are making a tidy sum from gambling due to that experience. For someone with no-where near that level of experience or knowledge to be aggressive after a losing streak, sounds the alarm bells. Disaster might not be far away. We also know a pro gambler who retreats after a winning streak. He’s more selective, he reduces stakes. The main take here is know yourself, know what works well for you and stick to it.
Let’s get into Dr Jack’s system first. He noticed from studying tipsters that there was roughly a 33% chance that all of the tipster fail to pick the winner! So there’s a 33% chance that an outsider will win. A similar system was on TV many years ago, when people were betting expecting to lose and noticed that they were in profit. It is crude but it kind of makes sense. 95% of people lose. What do 95% of people bet on? Fancied horses. Going against what the losing crowd do could mean getting the opposite results of those losing! Dr Jack had a strategy where he would look at the horses that the tipsters did not pick and select horses accordingly. His strategy was in our humble opinion verging on gamblers fallacy, where he would track races during the day, similar to the Martingale system without the staking plan, and strike with a horse that he fancied from the system. Patience is a virtue.
We like the mathematics behind the system and from our records and tracking it is effective, but the idea of waiting and seeing doesn’t really appeal to us. Having said that, you can not argue with the results. Backing against the grain worked for Dr Jack and his system of betting on unfancied horses with a fair chance of winning makes a lot of sense.
At the day of writing, 16th March 2021, we are going to look deeper at this strategy.
1:00 Southwell – only one selection where tipster haven’t tipped – Breezyandbright at 25-1. Favourite was High Security at 8/13. It’s a Novice stakes race and to us an easy swerve.
1:20 Cheltenham – the Supreme Novices Hurdle – Appreciate it is favourite at 8/11. There are four unfancied horses, Blue Lord (11/1), For Pleasure (40/1), Grumpy Charley (28/1), Irasacible 25/1. This would probably be an easy swerve for Dr Jack too. For those who follow us, you may recall we actually were on For Pleasure at 50/1 (it finished 3rd).
1:35 Southwell – three horses Arzaak, Marwarid, Farhsical. A 6 runner, class 6, 5f handicap. Once again an easy swerve for Dr Jack.
Here we now have a situation where 3 races have been taken by the tipsters. They are winning 3-0 on the day. Of course, we are dealing with maths here, anything can happen. But according to Dr Jack and backed up by our research, it’s roughly a 33% chance to have a race where non-fancied horses will win. So did Dr Jack lump on at this point?! No. He was patient in his approach.
1:45 Sedgfield is another really easy swerve. Novices hurdle. 6 horses that were not fancied. But the top 3 in the market all around 3/1
1:55 Cheltenham – Shishkin is 4/9 favourite. Swerved
2:10 Southwell – this is where things get slightly interesting for Dr Jack. All five races have gone to the tipsters. 5-0. This is a 6 runner handicap with Tigray and Cold Harbour non fancied horses. Tigray 40/1 and Cold Harbour 5/1 4th favourite. It’s an open race and Cold Harbour certainly had a chance (so this is a possible selection for Dr Jack). My Boy Sepoy won the race at 4/1.
So that’s 6-0 to the tipsters. And possibly a losing bet for Dr Jack.
2:20 Sedgfield has Sabbathical at 6/5 and looks like another to avoid. Costly Diamond wins at 3/1. It’s 7-0 to the tipsters.
2:30 Cheltenham is a 16 runner Handicap Chase. There are 9 selections. It’s another to avoid for Dr Jack. Vintage Clouds win at 28/1. It was tipped!
8-0 to the tipsters.
This is where Dr Jack would be looking at the 8-0 and sniffing a non-fancied horse to romp home.
2:45 Southwell. 9 runner handicap Class 4. Lord Oberon is a 2/1 favourite. There are 4 horse not fancied.
Let’s look at the market
Lord Oberon 2/1
Daafr 3/1
Lincoln Park 7/2
Revolutionary Man 11/1
Zylan 12/1
Little Boy Blue 16/1
Giogiobbo 18/1
Never in Paris 20/1
Broken Spear 40/1
The non-fancied horses are Lincoln Park, Broken Spear, Little Boy Blue, Giogiobbo.
This 100% would have been where Dr Jack would have gone in. His theory was that if the chances were 33% of a race where a non-fancied horse won, then this would be where the odds were in his favour. For example, if it’s currently an 8-0 to the tipsters then it’s likely (not certain) that sooner or later a non-fancied horse would win. However, look at this market! It gives Lincoln Park a very good chance of winning (3rd favourite, just behind Daafr). The other horses are not really fancied by the market. So here we have a tick box. 3rd favourite at a nice price, 7/2 and it’s well fancied (but not by our tipsters).
The winner of the race was Lincoln Park at 7/2.
So according to our reckoning Dr Jack would either be £350 in profit on the day if just selecting Lincoln Park or £250 up if he selected Cold Harbour. Depending on how he felt, that would be him done for the day, but here is where we think the system is a little bit flawed. Dr Jack would not get involved with the next two races following a winning – untipped horse. We don’t really follow the logic of this and suggest it may simply be down to the 33% rule. Either way, we don’t understand it but it was a winning system for him and as mentioned before, he had rules in place which was is a good thing. But we just don’t get the logic.
We do think that stopping when you feel like it, is a great rule and stopping when £350 has been added to the bank is always good.
Where we really like the system is more about the selection process. Randomly backing outsiders is never going to pay in the long term. Backing selected horses at good prices, that have a very good chance of winning, is a much better strategy.
2:55 Sedgefield Looked like an easy swerve. 13 horse handicap. However, Be the Difference was 7/2 favourite and was the shortest price of 9 untipped horses. This would be irrelevant to Dr Jack because of his rules!
3:05 Cheltenham looks another easy swerve (but Dr Jack would not get involved anyway)
It was won by Honeysuckle at 11/10
So it’s Tipsters 10 Unfancied horses 1
3:20 Southwell
If Dr Jack was still in the bookies, he would now be back and switched on for the next race. It’s one where 2 unfancied horses run in a 7 horse race. Sir Rodneyredblood at 11/2 and Ustath at 12/1. Sir Rodneyredblood is 3rd favourite and one we think there’s a possibility Dr Jack would get involved with.
Custard the Dragon won. 7/4 favourite. It’s now 11 – 1 in scores. Obviously 1 in 12 is way below the 33% but this is maths, anything can happen.
3:30 Sedgefield is a novice handicap chase and we think this would be an easy swerve for Dr Jack. Tico Times won at 20/1
It’s now 11 – 2 to the tipsters.
Dr Jack would not get involved in the next two races.
3:40 Cheltenham
Black Tears wins at 11/1 Third favourite and unfancied by tipsters.
Now it’s 11 -3 to the tipsters
3:55 Southwell
Kylluckey wins at 8/1 – another unfancied by tipsters
However, Dr Jack wouldn’t get involved with either of the last two races (both won by unfancied horses).
11 – 4 to the tipsters
Now we are seeing more of a true reflection of statistics. 27% of races so far today have gone to the unfancied horses.
4:05 Sedgfield is another easy swerve for Dr Jack. Mongol Emperor wins at 8/15
That’s 12-5
4:15 Cheltenham looks highly competitive 22 runners handicap hurdle. Easy swerve. Jeff Kidder wins at 80/1 Unfancied. 12-6
4:35 Sedgefield is an easy swerve for Dr Jack
13-6
4:50 Cheltenham again and easy swerve
14-6
5:05 Sedgefield is a close one. There is a well fancied favourite in Booley Beach 11/8. However, Lactara is unfancied and third favourite in the market at 9/2. Other unfancied horses are Dillarchie 28/1, Howzat Hiris 50/1 Mon Ray 12/1. It’s not entirely certain if Dr Jack would go for this. Remember, so far there’s just been one 100% selection that won at 7/2. This one is close.
Dillarchie wins at 28/1
14-7
5:15 Newcastle – Dr Jack wouldn’t get involved in
15-7
5:45 Newcastle – See above, no Dr Jack bet
16-7
6:15 Newcastle – Easy swerve
17-7
6:45 Newcastle – Easy swerve
18-7
7:15 Newcastle – is another very close one for Dr Jack in our opinion. It’s a 4 runner race. There’s only one unfancied horse, Restless Endevour at 11/1. The outsider of the quartet. The unfancied % for the day is 28%. A tiny bit behind expected for Dr Jack, so this could possibly be a selection but it’s not certain.
Restless Endevour wins at 11/1
This is interesting for us because when you have a clear cut and obvious Dr Jack selection, just one for the day at 7/2, it’s profit. When you add all of the possible selections it’s still a massive profit. Two winners at 7/2 and 11/1 is very impressive.
18/8
That would definitely be Dr Jack done for the day.
7:45 Newcastle – Devils Angel wins at 3/1 favourite
19/8
8:15 Newcastle – This is very interesting to us and again it highlights our bemusement at Dr Jack’s two race ban after unfancied winner rule.
For Peat’s Sake is 5/1 third favourite. 10 runners. Outcast favourite at 16/5. Mata Boy next at 9/2.
This would have been a clear and obvious selection for Dr Jack but no bet for him.
And For Peat’s Sake wins at 5/1
Final score 19/9
And there it is final percentage score is 32% for unfancied horses.
Which was roughly what Dr Jack calculated.
It’s worth pointing out that this is maths and any thing can happen. It could be that the unfancied horses have 100% of winners that day or the tipsters have 100% winners that day. Anything can happen.
In short, Dr Jack was selective, had rules to follow, liked to work on assumptions relating to expected values and struck accordingly.
In our opinion it is a good system standing alone but horse racing is about perception. There’s no way of possibly knowing what was going on in Dr Jack’s perception but from just one day of racing, it has picked a 100% certain selection – winner at 7/2 and a few not so certain, including a winner at 11/1. We don’t need to tell you that it’s a lot of profit for the day.
With the uncertainty it’s been hard for us to monitor results as you can imagine, but we have tinkered with the system and it has produced very impressive returns.
For the day above, there were five selections using our strategy. And bear in mind, all of these selections didn’t involve waiting to see what the stats were. Half an hour of study in the morning chose the following selections.
Cheltenham 1:20 For Pleasure 40/1
Southwell 2:45 Lincoln Park 7/2
Newcastle 8:15 For Peat’s Sake 5/1
Newcastle 7:15 Restless Endevour 11/1
Southwell 3:20 Ustath 12/1
For Pleasure finished 3rd
Lincoln Park won
For Peat’s Sake won 5/1
Restless Endevour won 11/1
Ustath finished 3rd (in a 7 runner)
To £100 level win stakes that is a £1,750 clear profit.
To £50 level each way stakes it’s £1,420 clear profit.
Using the 7/2 rule there could be an argument to back the 40/1 horse each way and the others straight wins.
This would bump it up to a £2,200 clear profit in one day. Meaning £50 each way for For Pleasure and the rest £100 straight wins.
How you stake etc is up to you but we think 1% of your bankroll for each stake is a good place.
If Dr Jack’s system works for you then give it a go.
In short his easy swerves were trappy looking contests, novice races, big runner fields, clear favourite with a great chance of winning.
He also avoided the 2 races after an unfancied/un tipped horse won.
He would monitor the days racing (in a smoke filled bookmakers) and strike when all the criteria hit. He would leave it for the day when he didn’t feel like betting or after a big win.
You might be asking how you find unfancied horses? Well, it’s free online – Racing post cards have how many tipsters pick the horse (e.g 4 tips, 3 tips) and ones that have no tips under their name are unfancied. There’s also paid sites like Napchecker that focus on tipsters. It’s worth noting that they add Irish tipsters.
We like Dr Jack’s system but don’t like the almost gamblers fallacy like part of it. We get that in general stats should balance out and most days will replicate long term stats, see example above. But it’s worth noting that we are dealing with maths, and as we’ve mentioned several times, anything can happen. We believe having a clearer approach is the better way forward. Monitoring the results and keeping a track of things are fine if they work, but we think that puts us at the mercy of what has happened and we are not looking at races as a stand-alone entity.
We believe that looking at this system first thing in the morning or the evening before and highlighting potential winners is the better option.
We recommend, scrapping all the “easy swerves” as mentioned above. Then look at the races that are left, see qualifiers, unfancied horses by tipsters that are actually fancied by the market. We are talking about possibly 3rd or 4th favourites. We think they should be over the 7/2 mark and we aim for a 33% strike rate. But we also want to get a good run from our money by way of the jockey and trainer. That’s why we have included our exclusive ratings system. You have to add the jockey and trainer name details in for each race.
Now it’s up to you to combine this data and come up with a selection. Some are really really straightforward and obvious. For example, if an unfancied horse is 7/2 second favourite, it’s a decent race, favourite is around 3/1 and there’s around 10 runners. And if that 7/2 horse scores well on our software then boom – easy selection. If that same horse was 7/2, the favourite was even money and the horse didn’t score that well, some may want to not bother. It’s entirely up to you how to proceed, but one of the golden rules in betting and in life, if in doubt, do nowt, might be your best approach. Let’s look at another scenario. Let’s say it’s a big field and an unfancied horse scores very well on our software and it’s around 40/1. This is really where you would have to bring in existing form reading skills. If you fully believe that it’s value then it gets a green light from us.
If you want a rigid set of rules (e.g – the obvious selections) then stick to that. IF you want something a little more free then go with that. We would fully recommend that you stick with the rules for a month at least and evaluate after that time. If it’s working then stick with it, if not, adjust. We know that some of you have been absolutely smashing it with a more flexible approach so, go with what works best for you.
There are other ways you can use this system, but we prefer backing to win. We looked into backing longer priced horses and trading them in play. A back to lay type strategy. We monitored and it did provide good results, but again, the options are so vast that it would need rules set in place by you. You might want to aim for 50% ROI on each selection or aim for a free bet by laying at lower odds or have an exit strategy if things are not going well. We think that options are too wide ranging for us to give you advice on the trading front.
In short, we recommend, focusing on untipped horses where the market fancies those horses, avoiding trappy races, and where the trainer and jockey looks like it will give a good run for the money. If you want to look at longer priced runners, then add your form reading skills to the mix. Aim for horses over 7/2 and for a 33% strike rate. Be very selective, don’t go crazy when 8 tipped horses win in a row and fall into the gamblers fallacy trap. It’s maths…etc. Have a good reason to get involved. Remember, this is not a system for those of you who want a bet in every single race. Be selective, stay calm and get that profit!
The Celebration is a great way to get a lot of good priced winners. We fully recommend that you record your bets (there’s loads of free software online to do this). Reviewing your bets daily is good practice. In time, with practice, the selection process will be easy.
Below is the book that we believe Dr Jack got his system from. It’s a cracking read looking into maths and probability. Well work a look.
CONVERGING FACTOR RACING FORMULAS BY PROMATH
BOBBY GOALS CELEBRATION TRAINER AND JOCKEY SOFTWARE
You will have received your own Celebration Trainer and Jockey Software via email. Remember to enable the document!
Instructions. From the Racing Post cards –
Enter horse names
Enter jockey names
Enter trainer names
Once you do that, it will calculate value for each horse in relation to trainer and jockey.
Do NOT use this as the be all and end all of selections. This is ONLY here to give you a rough idea of whether the trainer and jockey will give you a good run for your money. Here’s how we recommend you use it. You will see in column B that there is a bar going across the cells. The longer the bar, the better. If the bar is green, that is a good sign as well.
It will calculate up to the top 6 horses for the race you select.
It will also give the top selection.
In relation to the Celebration system, we recommend following the above and adding the trainer and jockey ratings. But how you decide to bet is completely up to you. People have told us that they are just following Dr Jack’s original strategy and smashing it.
We will from time to time pick our selections using the Celebration System and post them on this page.
This will give you an idea of how to use the system.
But we will go into more detail about selection process and what is in our opinion the best approach.
We prefer to see green bars of value on the spreadsheet against a horse before we get involved. But as we said before, it is certainly not the be all and end all!
We will only get involved with a horse that is 7/2 or over.
If there are more than one selection, as a rule of thumb we would go for the software selection, unless the other qualifier has a 3 times more likely chance of winning according to the market. See more below.
We also avoid all unfavourable looking races, novices, and in general, very large fields etc.
Of course, how you proceed with the Celebration is entirely up to you.
We have also included a ROI calculator so you can calculate potential trades.
Let us look into more detail about selection process. For example, 1:00 Redcar on 19th June. There were only two qualifiers. Selection was Regal World, with Stripzee a very close second. Not much to choose between them at all. Stripzee opened at 50/1 and Regal World 66/1. The market thought both horses had little chance. The chart shows roughly the % chance at starting price, not opening price. As you can see, both 66/1 and 50/1 have little chance of winning. At this point you obviously have several options. You could back them both by splitting stakes, you could go with the shortest price option, you could wait and see what the market does, you could trade both in a back to lay strategy or you could swerve it completely. All are valid options, but our suggestion would be, in general, back the lowest priced horse. In this case Stripzee at 50/1. However, by the start of the race, Stripzee was at 20/1 and Regal World was 40/1. This is a lot clearer than the starting price. 20/1 winners at starting price, statistically land just over 3% of the time and 40/1 just over 1% of the time. At this point, the market would over-rule the top selection.
This was an interesting race, but clear as crystal on which horse to back. 3:55 Thirsk Tuesday 15th June. Below are all highlighted qualifiers from Dr Jack’s system. Remember, those highlighted are all untipped. But look Cassy O is the favourite to win. At this point in the day, Dr Jack would be chomping at the bit as most of the races were won by horses tipped. However, as much as some of you love that system, we prefer fine tuning and using a bit more of a strategy in place. This is a race that interests us. The first and second favourite are both untipped. It’s a wide open race. It’s looking good so far. We then go to the spreadsheet, enter the details.
OK, so we fine tune our selections and now we see that there are three horses that look good on our software. Eldelbar is 16/1, Redrosezorro is 18/1 and Cassy O is 9/2. This is a pretty cut and dry selection to back Cassy O. Remember, we said we would go in favour of the market and this one is pretty clear cut. We are looking at around a 19% chance of winning on a 9/2 shot, 4.6% on 16/1 and 4% on 18/1. So, whilst the favourite was 3rd in the software, it was 1st in the market of the three by some way. If they were all roughly the same price, then going with the selection is the sensible move. As a rule of thumb, if there are three horses like this and one of the horses is 3 times likely to win than the others then that would be the wisest selection most of the time. This is where you can use your discretion. As with the example above 3 times more likely to win is the flexible rule. But what about a real tricky one. Let’s say there were three horses, 11/2, 14/1 and 50/1. Software selection was the 14/1, 2nd top rated was the 50/1 and 3rd top rated was 11/2. In this case, we can easily eliminate the 50/1. So we are left with 11/2 (3rd top rated, just like Cassy O) and a 14/1 top rated. 11/2 has just over a 13% chance of winning. 14/1 has a 5.3% chance of winning. So in this case, we would go with the original Selection. But it is very close. If it was 9/2 vs 14/1 then we would side with the 9/2 as it is 3 times more likely to win.
6:05 Beverley on the same day was a lot trickier. The race has a fair few runners, but looks good. Highlighted are all the Dr Jack qualifiers. We run it through our software and it picks 3 Dr Jack Qualifiers that it thinks will do well.
We have narrowed it down to Moretti, Groupie and Singe Anglais. 14/1, 50/1 and 11/2. Software selection was Moretti at 14/1, 2nd top rated was Groupie 50/1 and 3rd top rated was Singe Anglais at 11/2. In this case, we can easily eliminate the 50/1. So we are left with 11/2 (3rd top rated, just like Cassy O) and a 14/1 top rated. 11/2 has just over a 13% chance of winning. 14/1 has a 5.3% chance of winning. So in this case, we would go with the original Selection. But it is very close. If it was 9/2 vs 14/1 then we would side with the 9/2 as it is 3 times more likely to win. In this race Moretti opened at 9/1 Singe Anglais opened at 6/1. At this stage, things are a lot easier in the selection process, it obviously Morretti that is the pick should you wish to get involved. Moretti went on to win but that is by the by, the only thing we are interested in here is to give you a suggested guidance of what to do in these tricky situations.
Northumberland Plate – New Software analysis
As tricky as it will ever get. What to do when there are 3 qualifiers?
As with a lot of winning systems, you have to be flexible in your approach to suit your own style. We believe that Dr Jack’s system is good and gets results, but when we add our own analysis and approach, that is where the magic starts to happen. At the time of writing, some have reported great winning actually backing in those trappy races. Novice races and huge fields at Royal Ascot. We think that is fantastic and it obviously works well for you, but being a lot more selective works better for others. We very much hope that this work through and analysis will clear up any confusion.
All the best
Bobby